Documents & Reports

AI that writes your reports and checks your documents.

The reports your quality and maintenance teams write by hand, drafted from your own plant data, in your templates, with every claim cited. Engineering drawings read and cross-referenced. Invoices, orders, receipts and certificates checked against each other automatically.

Reports · LibraryYOUR TEMPLATES
  • Customer complaint reply (8D)In production
  • Daily quality and production summaryIn production
  • Deep-dive: quality, production, maintenanceDelivered
  • Nonconformance and corrective actionPer plant
  • Audit and compliance evidencePer plant
Every claim cites the data and past cases behind it
Proven

8D drafting and daily summaries are in production. Deep-dive quality, production and maintenance analyses have been delivered on a year of production data (about 3.5 million parts).

01 · Reports

The paperwork of quality and maintenance, drafted from the data.

Other report types are configured per plant, on your templates. We start with the report that costs your engineers the most hours.

01

Customer complaint replies (8D)

D1 to D8 drafted from your own past 8D history, with the root cause citing the similar past cases it drew on.

In production
02

Daily quality and production summaries

A short morning report per line: what ran, what stopped, what was rejected and what is drifting.

In production
03

Deep-dive analyses

Quality, production and maintenance analyses across months of data, to find the causes that day-to-day reports miss.

Delivered
04

Nonconformance and corrective-action reports

Nonconformance records and corrective-action reports drafted from inspection and process data.

Configured per plant
05

Audit and compliance evidence

Evidence packs assembled from sealed inspection records and versioned spec limits, in the format your auditors ask for.

Configured per plant
How reports are drafted

Complaint in. Cited draft out.

  1. 01

    Your history becomes searchable

    Past reports, inspection records and process data, kept on your plant server or in your own cloud account.

  2. 02

    Similar cases are found

    For a new complaint or report, the closest past cases and the relevant data are pulled together.

  3. 03

    A full draft, with sources

    The report is drafted in your template, each section citing the data and cases behind it.

  4. 04

    Review, edit, issue

    The engineer accepts, edits or rewrites each section and issues it under their own name.

Reports · 8D draftCC-2026-0412 · DRAFT
Customer complaint
Terminal crimp height out of tolerance, lot 26-0918
  1. D1TeamReviewed
  2. D2Problem descriptionReviewed
  3. D3Containment actionsReviewed
  4. D4Root causeDrafted

    AI DRAFTCrimp height drift traced to wear on the anvil insert after the last regrind. Insert life exceeded the interval used on comparable tooling; measurement frequency did not catch the trend before shipment.

    Based on 3 similar past reports8D-2024-0318D-2025-0078D-2025-019
    Accept and editShow evidence
  5. D5Permanent corrective actionsDrafted
  6. D6Implement and validatePending
  7. D7Prevent recurrencePending
  8. D8Close and recognise the teamPending
02 · Engineering drawings

Read the drawings ordinary OCR can't.

Dimensions, tolerances and materials extracted from engineering drawings, then cross-referenced to find equivalent parts, with the tolerance differences that decide whether a part is a true substitute.

  • →
    ExtractionDimensions, tolerances and materials pulled from drawings that defeat ordinary OCR.
  • →
    Cross-referenceEquivalent parts found, with every tolerance difference shown side by side.
  • →
    Proven90%+ match confidence on drawing cross-reference at a Fortune 500 connector manufacturer.
Drawings · Extraction and cross-referenceDWG-4471 REV C
FeatureValue
Length42.0 ±0.05
Height12 ±0.1
BoreØ8 H7
MaterialCuSn6
Equivalent part found94% match
P-20318 · same material, same bore
Tolerance differs Length ±0.10 vs ±0.05 required: not a true substitute
Illustrative
03 · Document validation

Documents checked against each other, not just read.

Invoices, purchase orders, goods receipts and certificates are checked against each other automatically. What matches clears; what doesn't goes to an exception queue for a person to decide.

  • ~110
    Documents a day, validated automaticallyAt an integrated food-processing group, across seven checkpoints: invoice, PO, GST, weighbridge and e-way bill.
  • SAP
    Read-only integrationWrites back only the validation status. Nothing else in the ERP changes.
Documents · ValidationINBOUND · TODAY
Document set
GRN-26-10-0418
To exception queue
  1. 1Invoice ↔ purchase orderMatch
  2. 2PO ↔ goods receipt quantityMatch
  3. 3GST detailsMatch
  4. 4Weighbridge weightNet weight 2.4% below invoiceMismatch
  5. 5E-way billMatch
  6. 6Rates and totalsMatch
  7. 7Certificate attachedMatch
Write-back to ERP: validation status onlyIllustrative
Principles

Faster paperwork your people can stand behind.

01

Your data and history

Drafts are built from your own plant data and past reports, not from generic text.

02

Your templates

Reports come out in the formats your customers, auditors and managers already expect.

03

Every claim cited

Each statement cites the data and past cases it came from, so an engineer can check it before it is used.

04

People sign off

Nothing is issued automatically. Your engineers review, edit and own every report.

Start with one station

Send us one report or document your team handles by hand.

We will show you what a cited draft or an automatic check built from your own data looks like, and how your people would review it.